tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4521984283069584860.post5349122242356553152..comments2024-03-27T23:18:40.301+00:00Comments on Portugal Newswatch: McCanns vs Amaral verdict nearingPortugal Newswatchhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13869883354165870813noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4521984283069584860.post-26645566616104459812015-02-12T10:49:12.491+00:002015-02-12T10:49:12.491+00:00The amount of compensation awarded to five people ...The amount of compensation awarded to five people would surely be more than that awarded to four people.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4521984283069584860.post-31974507290560825702015-02-07T19:53:51.400+00:002015-02-07T19:53:51.400+00:00Quote "Amaral argued in Lisbon’s Palace of Ju...Quote "Amaral argued in Lisbon’s Palace of Justice that because Madeleine was still a ward of court the McCanns did not have the legal right to represent her". I've often asked myself: why did Amaral introduce this topic, with the possibility that his application might make the case go into extra time, when (in January 2014) he was already winning 4-1 with only minutes to play?<br />I ask myself such questions, with little hope of getting a sensible reply back. Can anyone help?dewi lennardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4521984283069584860.post-18751190423456504122015-02-05T15:12:28.773+00:002015-02-05T15:12:28.773+00:00Fiat justitia ruat caelumFiat justitia ruat caelumhighmyope1955https://www.blogger.com/profile/06571926772773078574noreply@blogger.com