We’ve all heard about the need for enough urgent action
to avoid a climate change calamity, but it simply isn’t happening.
Here in
Portugal, one of the most vulnerable countries to global warming, the authorities
have been moving decisively in the fight against climate change by replacing fossil
fuels with renewables. But this is only a small country. It is the major
polluters – China, the United States, India and Russia - that need to get their
act together if mass human and environmental destruction is to be avoided in
the not too distant future. This is not doomsday talk. It’s common sense based
on science.
Under Donald
Trump’s presidency the United States scoffed at climate change and made many decisions that slowed climate
action. President Joe Biden has tried to reverse that, but now a majority
far-right Supreme Court ruling has disrupted America’s ability to cut carbon emissions.
In another
recent development, airlines in Europe and the US are demanding weaker rules on
aviation emissions. In contrast to claims that airlines are aiming for net zero
emissions by 2050, a research study concludes that the airlines are responsible
for more global warming than previously thought and that their CO2 emissions
may triple by 2050. Some climate experts
say this is “the biggest long-term issue our generation faces.”
Setbacks such
as those created by supreme court judges, CEOs of fossil fuel organisations and
aviation executives are said to be “flying in the face of science.” Accusations are being made of “moral and
economic madness.”
The ones who
are most worried about all this are the young and those feeling trepidation
about future generations. Small countries such as Portugal, and even large ones
such as Australia, have grave concerns about heat waves, wildfires, rising sea
levels, floods and droughts, extreme conditions already often being experienced
with dreadful economic consequences.
Carbon dioxide
released into the Earth’s atmosphere is the main source of greenhouse gasses
that contribute to climate change. Most of it comes from just a few powerful countries.
The US annually dumps about 5.5 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. China
is currently dumping more than 10 billion tons, a massive figure that is
expected to reach well over 12 billion tons by 2027.
Antonio Guterres, secretary-general of the United Nations and former prime minister o f Portugal, has frequently spoken out about the need for urgent action. He has warned that most national climate pledges are simply not good enough. “This is not just my view. Science and public opinion are giving timid climate policies a giant fail mark,” he has said.
“We are witnessing a historic
and dangerous disconnect - science
and citizens are demanding ambitious and transformative climate action.
Meanwhile, many governments are dragging their feet.”
He anticipates that dreadful consequences will be
the result. Nearly half the world’s population are already highly vulnerable.
This is at a time when countries should all come together in the fight for
human lives instead of allowing senseless wars and political divisions to tear
us apart.
“The energy crisis exacerbated
by the war in Ukraine has seen a perilous
doubling down on fossil fuels by the major economies. The war has reinforced an
abject lesson: our energy mix is broken.”
The paradox, says Guterres,is
that cheaper, fairer and more reliable energy options, including wind and
solar, should have been developed sooner and faster. “Had we invested massively in renewable
energy in the past, we would not be so dramatically at the mercy of the
instability of fossil fuel markets.”
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has warned
that “it’s now or never” to avoid the worst impacts of the climate crisis. For our part, we must keep reminding ourselves that this is not just one
of the many matters troubling the world today. It is by far the biggest and the
very existence of humanity on planet Earth is at stake.